{
  "attachments": [],
  "comments_archived": true,
  "date": "2002-09-05T23:01:53.000Z",
  "layout": "post",
  "title": "RSS \"2.0\" - What's the catch?",
  "wordpress_id": 244,
  "wordpress_slug": "ooobfg",
  "wordpress_url": "http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=244",
  "year": "2002",
  "month": "09",
  "day": "05",
  "isDir": false,
  "slug": "ooobfg",
  "type": "entry",
  "postName": "2002-09-05-ooobfg",
  "html": "<p>On the hypothetical <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0, <a href=\"http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/09/05.html#rss_20\">Mark Pilgrim says:</a></p><blockquote><i>A basic <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0 document is no more complicated to learn (or type by hand) than a basic <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 0.9x document, and a complex <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0 document can be just as metadata-rich as a complex <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 1.0 document.</i></blockquote>\n\n<p>Great - I love it - let's go!  If Rael <a href=\"http://www.oreillynet.com/~rael/data/xml/rss/modular/demo/\">already mocked this up</a> many moons ago, why hasn't it been adopted?</p><p></p>\n<p>What's the catch?  I just snatched Mark's <a href=\"http://diveintomark.org/public/rss2_draft.tmpl\">RSS 2.0 draft template for MT</a> and tossed it into my config.  Try out my <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/newslog-rss2.xml\">0xDECAFBAD feed</a> in the <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0 draft format and tell me what part of it burns down your house or frightens the children.</p>\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n<p>shortname=ooobfg</p>\n<div id=\"comments\" class=\"comments archived-comments\"><h3>Archived Comments</h3>\n<ul class=\"comments\">\n<li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221090219\">\n<div class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"author\">\n<a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://markpasc.org/\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=7e91c7ddf6c6db73665d8df9bb55d0d9&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\" width=\"\" height=\"\"></a>\n<a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://markpasc.org/\">Mark Paschal</a>\n</div>\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#comment-221090219\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2002-09-05T23:59:45\">2002-09-05T23:59:45</time></a></p>\n</div>\n\n\n<div class=\"content\">It works in Radio, which I suppose is a sign of some sort.</div>\n\n\n</li>\n<li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221090220\">\n<div class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"author\">\n<a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://clarity.awakeheart.net\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=502e4c93d90bfb0ab915ebe70aa0c631&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\" width=\"\" height=\"\"></a>\n<a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://clarity.awakeheart.net\">clarity</a>\n</div>\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#comment-221090220\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2002-09-16T13:06:48\">2002-09-16T13:06:48</time></a></p>\n</div>\n\n\n<div class=\"content\">It works in Aggie as well!</div>\n\n\n</li>\n</ul>\n\n\n</div>\n\n\n",
  "body": "<p>On the hypothetical <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0, <a href=\"http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/09/05.html#rss_20\">Mark Pilgrim says:</a><blockquote><i>A basic <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0 document is no more complicated to learn (or type by hand) than a basic <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 0.9x document, and a complex <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0 document can be just as metadata-rich as a complex <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 1.0 document.</i></blockquote>Great - I love it - let's go!  If Rael <a href=\"http://www.oreillynet.com/~rael/data/xml/rss/modular/demo/\">already mocked this up</a> many moons ago, why hasn't it been adopted?</p>\r\n<p>What's the catch?  I just snatched Mark's <a href=\"http://diveintomark.org/public/rss2_draft.tmpl\">RSS 2.0 draft template for MT</a> and tossed it into my config.  Try out my <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/newslog-rss2.xml\">0xDECAFBAD feed</a> in the <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RSS\">RSS</a> 2.0 draft format and tell me what part of it burns down your house or frightens the children.</p>\r\n<!--more-->\r\nshortname=ooobfg\r\n\r\n<div id=\"comments\" class=\"comments archived-comments\">\r\n            <h3>Archived Comments</h3>\r\n            \r\n        <ul class=\"comments\">\r\n            \r\n        <li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221090219\">\r\n            <div class=\"meta\">\r\n                <div class=\"author\">\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"http://markpasc.org/\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=7e91c7ddf6c6db73665d8df9bb55d0d9&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\"/></a>\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"http://markpasc.org/\">Mark Paschal</a>\r\n                </div>\r\n                <a href=\"#comment-221090219\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2002-09-05T23:59:45\">2002-09-05T23:59:45</time></a>\r\n            </div>\r\n            <div class=\"content\">It works in Radio, which I suppose is a sign of some sort.</div>\r\n            \r\n        </li>\r\n    \r\n        <li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221090220\">\r\n            <div class=\"meta\">\r\n                <div class=\"author\">\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"http://clarity.awakeheart.net\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=502e4c93d90bfb0ab915ebe70aa0c631&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\"/></a>\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"http://clarity.awakeheart.net\">clarity</a>\r\n                </div>\r\n                <a href=\"#comment-221090220\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2002-09-16T13:06:48\">2002-09-16T13:06:48</time></a>\r\n            </div>\r\n            <div class=\"content\">It works in Aggie as well!</div>\r\n            \r\n        </li>\r\n    \r\n        </ul>\r\n    \r\n        </div>\r\n    ",
  "parentPath": "./content/posts/archives/2002",
  "path": "2002/09/05/ooobfg",
  "summary": "On the hypothetical RSS 2.0, Mark Pilgrim says:A basic RSS 2.0 document is no more complicated to learn (or type by hand) than a basic RSS 0.9x document, and a complex RSS 2.0 document can be just as metadata-rich as a complex RSS 1.0 document.\n\nGreat - I love it - let's go!  If Rael already mocked this up many moons ago, why hasn't it been adopted?\nWhat's the catch?  I just snatched Mark's RSS 2.0 draft template for MT and tossed it into my config.  Try out my 0xDECAFBAD feed in the RSS 2.0 draft format and tell me what part of it burns down your house or frightens the children.",
  "needsBuild": true,
  "prevPostPath": "2002/09/05/ooobff",
  "prevPostTitle": "Further down the LiveJournal spiral",
  "nextPostPath": "2002/09/05/ooobfh",
  "nextPostTitle": "Once more into the RSS breach - what's the catch?"
}